When we’re carrying it’s useful to know what makes a carry active or passive. Knowing this means we can support their physical development appropriately, as well as switching to passive holds when they are tired, relieving them of some of the work. Each position has its own rules for active- and passiveness, so let’s take a look to see how some of these differ.
A shoulder hug is a carry where the baby or child’s legs tend to be always supported. The nature of the carry, being off-centre at the front of the body, with legs up on the chest/ribs means it’s not generally conducive to clinging. Clinging usually relies on the clinger grasping on to the body either at the side or the front/back of the body. The way it varies from passive to active is to do with how their upper body is (or isn’t) being supported, as each position offers a greater or lesser opportunity of active clinging. Clinging can, of course, happen here too, but to speak to a more general audience we are approaching from a more generalised approach.
In an active hold, the baby/child tends to support their upper body either partially or fully (dependent on stage of development) and is lower on the caregiver’s body. In a passive hold they tend to be higher up and partially supported by the caregiver’s shoulder and may also have the additional support of the caregiver’s hand on their back/nape of neck. This isn’t always the case but is usual of “regular” of in-arms carrying here in the UK. The shoulder hug helps newborns develop neck control and upper-torso strength and forms a large part of their active carrying in the early weeks. Here we will look some other different positions on the caregiver’s body to show how an active carry can vary drastically depending on where on the body – and how! – you are supporting them.
Hip carrying’s activeness is all about what their legs are doing. To support them in an active position all hands and arms need to be away from the legs and bum. An active hip carry is where the baby/child is clinging with their legs, doing most of the work. When they are clinging, their perceived weight is much less than “normal” in-arms holds and babywearing. Supporting their back lower down reduces the amount of work they need to do with their legs, whilst supporting higher up increases it. This means the caregiver and baby/child have to prioritise more their teamwork in carrying as the little one learns how to take on a more active role. For caregivers with children past the reflexive carrying stage it can sometimes mean taking them back to the reflexive stage and supporting them in ways seemingly more suited to younger ones.
Hip carrying is inherently active. We do also carry passively on the hip but it is a practice which seems to come with questionable poses. Is it that we have learned to hold them on the hip like this so know no better, or have our bodies become so weak that we cannot support them actively? Regardless, the biomechanics of the hip carry suggest it is meant to be an active one, ideally combined with movement.
A passive hip carry is where the caregiver supports the bum, legs, knee-pit/s etc. (one, all, or a combination of these), bearing the majority of their weight. Creating a “seat” for them triggers the baby/child to become passive and relax their legs. They may still be active in their upper body (or may be cuddled into you), but their participation in the carry is much less than when they are clinging with their legs. The physical response to a hand or an arm applied to the knee or leg/bum of the person being carried is phenomenal and I hope that this will be studied in great depth in the years to come.
This carry is passive when the legs are supported too. There is a slight difference here to the hip carry though. Newborns can be active in this carry even if their upper body is being supported against the caregiver’s body, as enabling their bum to rest on your hand keeps them reflexively squatting and “clinging” to the caregiver.
An active version of this carry for older babies is similar to the hip carry when babies are older. Their back is supported by the caregiver (what part of the back is in relation to physical development) but the legs are unsupported, so have to cling on. This can be harder for them until their legs are long enough for their feet to hook around the caregiver’s waist. The longer their legs, the more leverage they have. This can make clinging easier for those less physically-inclined towards it, as well as potentially guide us as to suitable positions for different ages.
So, it can be a bit confusing at first as different positions have different considerations, and so do different stages of development, but I hope this gives you an idea of how to gauge some positions’ activeness or passiveness. Each position offers different benefits to both clinger and caregiver and, as always, we recognise that each carrying dyad is different, that the clinger usually needs to learn how to cling effectively to each caregiver and that the needs’ balance may differ. Please comment with any questions and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.